2nd December 2024
How the Maputo Protocol has supported justice for survivors of sexual violence in Africa
11 min read
The Maputo Protocol, formally known as the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, is a beacon of hope for women and girls across the continent. Since its adoption in 2003, this landmark treaty has been pivotal in driving justice for survivors of sexual violence, fostering progressive legal reforms, and empowering African courts to take decisive action against gender-based violence.
As Africa continues to grapple with persistent challenges of sexual violence, the Maputo Protocol remains a crucial legal instrument for ensuring accountability for perpetrators, safeguarding survivors, and promoting gender equality.
In the following key judicial decisions, we examine its transformative impact on justice systems through significant cases and the wider legal framework it has helped shape.
The South African Constitutional Court made a groundbreaking decision by extending the doctrine of common purpose to rape cases. This doctrine ensures all members of a group involved in sexual violence are held accountable, even if they did not directly commit the act. The judgment emphasized that rape is not solely a sexual crime but a manifestation of power and control. The court’s reliance on the Maputo Protocol affirmed its call for decisive action to protect women’s dignity and security.
In the aftermath of Kenya’s post-election violence, survivors of sexual violence faced systemic neglect. The Kenyan High Court held the government accountable for failing to investigate and prosecute these crimes. By invoking the Maputo Protocol, the Court reinforced the state’s obligation to protect survivors and uphold the right to life, dignity, and security.
Uganda’s Constitutional Court declared sections of the Anti-Pornography Act unconstitutional, citing their violation of women’s rights to dignity and security. The court acknowledged the Maputo Protocol’s emphasis on eliminating discriminatory laws and protecting survivors from cultural and systemic victim-blaming.
During Mali’s armed conflict, survivors of sexual violence brought a case against the government. While the ECOWAS Court acknowledged procedural gaps in evidence, it reinforced the Maputo Protocol’s requirement for state accountability in protecting women during conflicts and prosecuting perpetrators.
The Maputo Protocol provides a comprehensive framework for addressing sexual violence. Key provisions include:
These provisions require Member States to align their domestic laws with the provisions of the Maputo Protocol to ensure the protection of survivors of sexual violence and the accountability of perpetrators. These provisions also empower the courts to set legal precedents that can influence how future cases of sexual violence are handled while incorporating the principles of the instrument.
To fully realize the Maputo Protocol’s promise, the following steps are crucial:
The Maputo Protocol remains a cornerstone of Africa’s fight against sexual violence. Its impact is visible in groundbreaking judicial decisions that amplify the voices of survivors and hold states accountable. However, the
4th July 2025
11 min read
“It still hurts”: Sudanese women speak out on FGM
3rd July 2025
11 min read
Connecticut misses clear opportunity to ban FGM/C within its state: We’re still advocating
30th June 2025
11 min read
The Supreme Court ruling in the Skrmetti case should have taken sex discrimination into account: 5 things to know
journey is far from over. By strengthening legal frameworks, investing in survivor support, and fostering cultural change, Africa can turn the Maputo Protocol’s vision of gender equality into a reality.