9th January 2020
Women’s March 2020: March for our human rights
6 min read
We march once again. When our rights are under attack, what do we do? STAND UP, FIGHT BACK.
This year’s March for Our Human Rights, focuses on bodily autonomy, which is the right to have control over one’s own body without coercion or external pressures. This includes abortion rights, sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR), sexual consent, period equality, family planning, access to healthcare services and information, and more.
In the last year alone, women’s sexual and reproductive and other human rights have experienced a massive rollback around the world. At a recent United Nations General Assembly meeting, the United States joined 19 member states, including Bahrain, Belarus, Brazil, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Guatemala, Haiti, Hungary, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Nigeria, Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen in declaring that women have no international right to abortion. The member states who denied women access to safe and legal abortion represent 1.3 billion people.
Our staff will be joining events in New York and in London. There are events all around the world from Nigeria and the U.S. to Canada and Australia, Find your closest events in the U.S. or around the world on the Women’s March websites.
If you can’t find an event near you, check out Women’s March Global’s handy flow chart for starting your own event.
Don’t have time to make a hand drawn sign? Don’t worry, we’ve pulled together some signs for you to print at home. With quotes from Margaret Atwood and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, as well as our favourite ‘Misogyny Bores Me’, you’ll be able to march with pride.
Wear your feminism on your sleeve, order your Equality Now tees and hoodies for the march today.
4th July 2025
6 min read
“It still hurts”: Sudanese women speak out on FGM
3rd July 2025
6 min read
Connecticut misses clear opportunity to ban FGM/C within its state: We’re still advocating
30th June 2025
6 min read
The Supreme Court ruling in the Skrmetti case should have taken sex discrimination into account: 5 things to know