10th June 2025

I need the ERA because… inequality harms everyone, including men

For nearly a century, the path to constitutional equality in the US has been framed primarily as a women’s issue. But true equality benefits everyone. Gender inequality, rooted in outdated roles and stereotypes, limits opportunity, well-being, and full participation in society for all people, including men and boys.

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) would protect everyone from sex-based discrimination, helping men and boys challenge harmful stereotypes, take on caregiving roles without stigma, and access justice in areas where they, too, face inequality. That’s why Equality Now has partnered with Equimundo and the ERA Coalition to engage men in advancing constitutional equality through the ERA.

What’s inside the factsheet?

  • The impact of rigid gender stereotypes on men
  • How the ERA could benefit men, and all people in the US
  • How Congress could use the ERA to combat discrimination

Who’s it for?

  • Men
  • CSOs, activists, ERA advocates
  • Lawyers and other legal practitioners

Key takeaways and recommendations

The ERA, when universally recognized and implemented, would establish a nationwide guarantee of sex equality under the law. This protection would apply to everyone, including boys and men, and would grant courts, the legislature, and the executive branch the power to combat sex and gender-based discrimination.

This could have tangible and far-reaching effects for men. For example, the ERA would grant Congress clear authority to pass legislation ensuring equitable paid leave for all parents. Fathers in the US currently take an average of just one week, compared to 11 weeks for mothers. Concerningly, up to 20 percent of companies fail to offer even unpaid parental leave to eligible fathers, as required under the limited Family and Medical Leave Act, compared to 7 percent for mothers. The ERA could help to address these gaps and advance policies that encourage a more equitable distribution of care. Importantly, a majority of men already support, and are willing to vote in favor of, policies to increase investments in care and ensure access to paid leave.

The ERA would also require courts to apply “strict scrutiny” to cases involving sex-based discrimination against men. This could provide a legal tool to tackle policies which perpetuate harmful gender stereotypes, whether facially or in practice, such as those which discourage men from entering caregiving professions or prevent male survivors of gender-based violence (GBV) from accessing or seeking the support they need. Assumptions about caregiving and GBV don’t just further entrench the gender divide, they also limit the opportunities of men and boys.

Constitutional equality is not about men losing rights, it is about all people gaining the legal protections and policies needed to build a more equitable society

Explore more resources

1

2

3

I need the ERA because…the voice of the US legal profession endorses it!

Equality Now has drawn out the key points of the ABA’s Resolution 601 report to bring the legal and broader community a concise, irrefutable analysis concluding that the ERA must be recognized and implemented. 

I need the ERA because…paid care is a right – gender equality and the care economy

I need the ERA because…without the ERA, the US violates international law

Newsletter Sign-up

Make a donation

I want to donate